Sunday, April 03, 2005

Ignorance is Strength at the Times

The New York Times is not content at the death of a man for whom they obviously had little use and even less understanding. They must also deface his memory and rewrite his passing in this editorial:

The death of Pope John Paul II came at a time when Americans have been engaged in an unusual moment of national reflection about mortality. The long, bitter fight over the unknowing Terri Schiavo was a stark contrast to the passing of this pontiff, whose own mind was keenly aware of the gradual failure of his body. The pope would certainly never have wanted his own end to be a lesson in the transcendent importance of allowing humans to choose their own manner of death. But to some of us, that was the exact message of his dignified departure.

I'm chalk-full of "stark contrasts" for the Times:
  • Terri Schiavo was starved to death; Karol Wojtyla died peacefully of natural causes.
  • More than a decade before she was starved and on more than one occasion, Terri was denied routine treatment for infections; the pope received antibiotics to treat sepsis shortly before his death.
  • Terri had her feeding tube pulled; the pope took nutrition through a nasal feeding tube before his death.
  • Terri was in no pain; the pope's suffering was visible every day for years.
And what to make of the confused conclusion? For "some" (of the editors, I guess) the pope's last act is somehow an act of advocacy for euthanasia. He was a man who insisted on being visible as he physically degenerated from a vigorous, vital pastor who loved both physical activity and conversational companionship at the start of his pontificate to a trembling, humble, pitiable elder, stooped, unable to walk, finally silent. He in no way chose "death with dignity," the favored euphemism for killing the sick and disabled. Had he been the "choosing" type, perhaps he would have called for assisted suicide in some spectacular way, perhaps a week earlier on Good Friday in order to have the faithful associate him with Jesus Christ. Fortunately, the pastor of the universal Church was not cut of the same cloth as the editorial board of the Times.

Instead, he submitted to suffering on its own terms, accepting life as a gift of the Divine. In doing so, he followed Christ in the way of the cross. "Death with dignity" was not for Christ,
who, though he was in the form of God, did not regard equality with God something to be grasped. Rather, he emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, coming in human likeness; and found human in appearance, he humbled himself, becoming obedient to death, even death on a cross.

Post a Comment

Goodreads Feed